This study takes architectural spatial cognitive bias as the entry point

and compares the differences between virtual reality (VR) technology and traditional design presentation methods in terms of creative expression and user comprehension efficiency through experiments. Aiming at the problem of spatial perception bias of non-professional users in the current presentation of design results

30 architectural professionals and non-professionals were selected as research subjects

and VR-Builder was used to construct an immersive virtual model

and control experiments were conducted with traditional PPT

rendering and other tools. It was found that the VR group was significantly better than the traditional group in spatial scale perception (4.5±0.6 vs. 3.2±0.8)

layout understanding (87.3% vs. 62.1%) and overall experience satisfaction (4.7±0.5 vs. 3.0±0.9) (p<0.001). The study reveals the potential of VR technology to reconfigure users' spatial intuition through embodied interaction

validating its effectiveness in bridging the cognitive gap in design communication.