A Preliminary Discussion on the Relationship Between Social Hierarchy and Numerical Reasoning Ability in Budgerigars

Danrong Li; Yuehua Sun; Shuai Kang

doi:10.47297/wspciWSP2516-252712.20230701

PDF
Export
Share
Collection
Album

A Preliminary Discussion on the Relationship Between Social Hierarchy and Numerical Reasoning Ability in Budgerigars

Volume 7, Issue 1

Views: 0 Downloads: 3

A Preliminary Discussion on the Relationship Between Social Hierarchy and Numerical Reasoning Ability in Budgerigars
A Preliminary Discussion on the Relationship Between Social Hierarchy and Numerical Reasoning Ability in Budgerigars
1. Beijing No.4 High School International Campus
2. Chinese Academy of Science Zoology apartment
3. Beijing No.4 High School
Vol. 7, Issue 1, Pages: 60-69(2023)
Published： 2023 ，
DOI：10.47297/wspciWSP2516-252712.20230701
Accepted：

Scan QR Code

DANRONG LI, YUEHUA SUN & SHUAI KANG. (2023). A Preliminary Discussion on the Relationship Between Social Hierarchy and Numerical Reasoning Ability in Budgerigars. Creativity and Innovation, 7(1), 60-69..
DOI：

DANRONG LI, YUEHUA SUN & SHUAI KANG. (2023). A Preliminary Discussion on the Relationship Between Social Hierarchy and Numerical Reasoning Ability in Budgerigars. Creativity and Innovation, 7(1), 60-69.. DOI： 10.47297/wspciWSP2516-252712.20230701.

摘要

Abstract

Background: Animal cognitive ability has received much attention in recent years. However

numerical reasoning ability in birds

an important manifestation of cognitive ability

is still at an early stage of investigation. Social hierarchy is common among group-living animals and plays an important role in many animal societies. Yet there are no studies showing the relationship between social hierarchy and numerical reasoning ability. Purpose: Explore the numerical reasoning ability of budgerigars and investigate the correlation between numerical reasoning ability and social hierarchy in budgerigars. Method: In Experiment 1

a numerical sequence was visualized and presented to budgerigars continuously. Their numerical reasoning ability was determined by measuring the number of trials the budgerigars went through before it successfully comprehend the sequence. After this

budgerigars that completed Experiment 1 will be stratified into three social classes through the evaluation of their fighting results in Experiment 2. Finally

the correlation between numerical reasoning ability and social hierarchy is analyzed. Conclusion: This study explored the numerical reasoning ability of budgerigars and found that numerical reasoning ability was not correlated with social hierarchy

and budgerigars with different social ranks showed uneven level of numerical reasoning ability. This study demonstrates that budgerigars have numerical reasoning ability.This has

to a certain extent

provided meaningful information and laid a solid foundation for future in-depth studies on the numerical cognitive ability of birds.

关键词

Keywords

BudgerigarsSocial dominanceNumerical reasoning abilityExpensive tissue hypothesis

references

Rowell TE. The concept of social dominance[J]. Behavioral Biology, 1974, 11(2): 131-54.Strauss ED, DeCasien AR, Galindo G, Hobson EA, Shizuka D, Curley JP. DomArchive: a century of published dominance data[J]. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2022, 377(1845): 20200436.[2] Hobson E, Avery M, Wright T, 2014. The socioecology of monk parakeets: Insights into parrot social complexity. Auk: Orni- thological Advances 131: 756–75.[3] Gotmark, F., Winkler, D. W. & Andersson, M. (1986). Flock-Feeding on Fish Schools Increases Individual Success in Gulls. Nature 319, 589–91.[4] Galef, B. G. & Giraldeau, L.-A. (2001). Social Influences on Foraging in Vertebrates: Causal Mechanisms and Adaptive Functions. Animal Behaviour 61, 3–15.[5] Murton, R. K., Isaacson, A. J. & Westwood, N. J. (1971). The Significance of Gregarious Feeding Behaviour and Adrenal Stress in a Population of Wood-Pigeons Columba Palumbus. Journal of Zoology 165, 53–84.[6] Hass, C. & Valenzuela, D. (2002). Anti-predator Benefits of Group Living in WhiteNosed Coatis (Nasua Narica). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 51, 570–578.[7] Collias NE. Aggressive Behavior among Vertebrate Animals[J]. Physiological Zoology, 1944, 17(1): 83-123.[8] Kruijt, J. P. and Jerry A. Hogan. “Social Behavior on the Lek in Black Grouse, Lyrurus Tetrix Tetrix (L.).” (1967).[9] Cox CR, Le Boeuf BJ. Female Incitation of Male Competition: A Mechanism in Sexual Selection[J]. The American Naturalist, 1977, 111(978): 317-35.[10] Järvi T. The Effects of Male Dominance, Secondary Sexual Characteristics and Female Mate Choice on the Mating Success of Male Atlantic Salmon Salmo salar[J]. Ethology, 1990, 84(2): 123-32.[11] Strauss ED, DeCasien AR, Galindo G, Hobson EA, Shizuka D, Curley JP. DomArchive: a century of published dominance data[J]. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2022, 377(1845): 20200436.[12] Hong Li, Antao Chen, Yanyong Feng ． The Development and Mechanism of Individual I Menner's Reasoning Ability. Psychological science．2004，27(6)：1457—59．[13] Characteristics of Numerical Inductive Reasoning ： Behavioraland ERP Evidence ． Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks，Orlando，Florida,USA，2007b，August：12-17．[14] Jialan Qin, Hong Li, Fuhong Li.The neural mechanism of lnar inference. 2010，32(2)：15．17．[15] Hanlu Ouyang An Electrophysiological Study of Numerical Reasoning in Children and Adults [D] Chongqing: Southwest University, 2011. DOI:10.7666/d.y1883080.[16] Bullock, Merry, and Rochel Gelman. “Numerical Reasoning in Young Children: The Ordering Principle.” Child Development, vol. 48, no. 2, 1977, pp. 427–34. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1128635. Accessed 8 Oct. 2022.Rowell TE. The concept of social dominance[J]. Behavioral Biology, 1974, 11(2): 131-54.[17] Bastos, Amalia P M, and Alex H Taylor. “Kea show three signatures of domain-general statistical inference.” Nature communications vol. 11,1 828. 3 Mar. 2020, doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14695-1[18] de VRIES H. Finding a dominance order most consistent with a linear hierarchy: a new procedure and review. Animal Behaviour. 1998 Apr;55(4):827-843. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0708. PMID: 9632471.[19] Soma, M., & Hasegawa, T. (2004). The effect of social facilitation and social dominance on foraging success of budgerigars in an unfamiliar environment. Behaviour, 141(9), 1121–34. https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539042664560[20] Isler K, van Schaik CP. The Expensive Brain: a framework for explaining evolutionary changes in brain size[J]. J Hum Evol, 2009, 57(4): 392-400.[21] Mery F. Natural variation in learning and memory[J]. Current opinion in neurobiology, 2013, 23(1): 52-56.[22] Striedter G F. Précis of principles of brain evolution[J]. The Behavioral and brain sciences, 2006, 29(1): 1-12; discussion 12-36.[23] Mery F, Kawecki Tadeusz J. A fitness cost of learning ability in Drosophila melanogaster[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 2003, 270(1532): 2465-69.[24] Cole E F, Quinn J L. Personality and problem-solving performance explain competitive ability in the wild[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2012, 279(1731): 1168-75.[25] Claudio Carere, Charles Locurto, Interaction between animal personality and animal cognition, Current Zoology, Volume57, Issue 4, 1 August 2011, Pages 491–98, https://doi.org/10.1093/czoolo/57.4.491.[26] Dougherty Liam R. and Guillette Lauren M. 2018Linking personality and cognition: a meta-analysisPhil. Trans. R. Soc. B3732017028220170282http://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0282.[27] Zidar, J., Balogh, A., Favati, A. et al. The relationship between learning speed and personality is age- and task-dependent in red junglefowl. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 72, 168 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2579-2.

Alert me when the article has been cited

Submit

No data

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

⁰