Under the guidance of the principle of “one country

two systems”

Hong Kong and Macao formed different jurisdictions after the return of Hong Kong and Macao. These same jurisdictions will also be different in handling problems due to different jurisdictions. With the development of economy

the trade between the mainland and Hong Kong and Macao increases gradually

and the inevitable out-come of trade development is civil and commercial disputes. More and more attention has been paid to the differences in the recognition and enforcement of civil and commercial judgments. The recognition and enforcement of civil and commercial judgments by the courts is the most important issue of judicial assistance in the main-land and the Hong Kong and Macao Special Administrative regions. Only when the circulation of civil and commercial judgments is realized in both places can better protection be given. The rights of the people will promote the healthy and sustainable development of economic and trade between the two places. The two bilateral “arrangements” reached in 2006 between the mainland and Macao and Hong Kong for mutual recognition and enforcement of civil and commercial judgments are also major achievements in the field of private law in China. There are still many differences in the scope of application

recognition and implementation procedures between the two arrangements

which can not meet the needs of the mainland and Hong Kong and Macao economic and trade exchanges. In view of this situation

the author thinks that it is necessary to study the recognition and enforcement of civil and commercial judgments of the courts of the mainland and the Hong Kong and Macao Special Administrative regions

and combine the actual situation of China and the practices of other countries and regions on the basis of the existing research results. Try to find the right way to coordinate and solve the problems between the two places The recognition of jurisdiction and judgment and the existence of conflict of laws realize the circulation of judgment in both places. With the help of existing data and existing achievements at home and abroad

this paper analyzes and probes into the recognition and enforcement of civil and commercial judgments in inland

Hong Kong and Macao. The text of this paper is divided into four parts. The first part introduces the basic issues of court judgment and recognition in interregional judicial assistance. The second part analyzes the status quo of the recognition and enforcement of the judgments in the mainland and the Hong Kong and Macao Special Administrative regions

and compares the two conditions of application

the scope

the differences and shortcomings of the procedures; In the third part

through the recognition and enforcement of the relevant international treaties and other inter-regional court decisions of other jurisdictions

we can find out

on the basis of the existing research of Chinese scholars

Lessons learned; The fourth part

has carried on some concrete suggestions to resolve the mainland and Hong Kong civil and commercial judgment recognition and the execution

for example

the inland and the Hong Kong and Macao again carries on the consultation to widen the existing “arrangement” the scope of application

has clarified the mainland court judgment validity question

The question of establishing a time limit for mutual recognition of enforcement.