As online fraud tactics evolve

electronic evidence has become a crucial component in convictions and sentencing. However

in judicial practice

the ephemeral nature of electronic evidence

its technical concealment

and the susceptibility of retrieval processes to third-party platform interference pose significant challenges in terms of timeliness and technical feasibility. At the level of legal application

ambiguities persist regarding the standards for admissibility of electronic evidence

technical criteria for authenticity verification

and procedural norms for evidence collection. This paper proposes improvement strategies

including establishing a technical support system

refining examination and recognition rules

and clarifying platform responsibility mechanisms

aiming to provide references for enhancing the collection of electronic evidence in online fraud cases.