Technology support and the catalysis of the epidemic

the effective implementation of the card breaking action

and the influence of the trend of judicial expansion have led to a surge in the number of crimes helping information network crimes. However

the improper expansion of the interpretation of the crime of assisting information network crime is easy to cross the criminal law ladder which is compatible with crime

responsibility and punishment

and violates the legal implication that everyone is equal in the application of criminal law

and should be limited. "Knowing" in the crime of helping trust should be carefully determined in form

content and degree. As for the "serious circumstances" in the crime of helping the letter

it is suggested to eliminate the second paragraph of the judicial interpretation which has a strong criminal law preventive color but has no legitimate basis

and further clarify the specific requirements of the sixth paragraph "causing serious consequences to the object of help". At the same time

priority may be given to the application of non-custodial measures to persons who have committed crimes.