Defense Strategies for Sales-based Wire Fraud

Yang Ma

doi:10.47297/wspjclrWSP2516-249708.20240801

PDF
Export
Share
Collection
Album

Defense Strategies for Sales-based Wire Fraud

Volume 8, Issue 1

Views: 0 Downloads: 0

Defense Strategies for Sales-based Wire Fraud
Guangdong Zhengping Tiancheng Law Firm
Vol. 8, Issue 1, Pages: 56-62(2024)
Published： 30 June 2024 ，
DOI：10.47297/wspjclrWSP2516-249708.20240801

Full txt

Yang Ma.Defense Strategies for Sales-based Wire Fraud[J].Critical Theory,2024,08(01):56-62.
DOI：

Yang Ma.Defense Strategies for Sales-based Wire Fraud[J].Critical Theory,2024,08(01):56-62. DOI： 10.47297/wspjclrWSP2516-249708.20240801.

摘要

Abstract

With the diversification and complexity trend of telecommunication fraud

the sales-based telecommunication fraud crime

as a new type of crime pattern

challenges the formulation of traditional criminal defense. This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the criminal overview of sales-type telecommunication fraud

behavioral characteristics and similarities and differences with ordinary civil fraud

focusing on the behavioral characteristics of false propaganda

exaggerated product effects and the transaction process. In the development of defense strategies

in-depth analysis of the definition of intent and subjective malice

analysis of the elements of the establishment of the crime of criminal fraud

as well as effective defense strategies in court are proposed. Meanwhile

through the discussion of legal issues

it is suggested to strengthen the protection of consumer rights and interests

clarify the boundaries of criminal legal liability

as well as address the inadequacies of the legal system for sales-based telecommunication fraud. Ultimately

this paper aims to provide new perspectives and theoretical support in the field of criminal defense

and to promote a more scientific and fair response to sales-based telecommunication fraud crimes in the legal community.

关键词

Keywords

CrimeDefense strategy

references

Gao Yuan (2021). Factors affecting college students' susceptibility to online fraud: psychological traits, experiential factors and cue processing. Master's thesis, Hangzhou: Zhejiang University.

ZHAO Lei, CHEN Hongmin (2022). A study on the influencing factors and formation mechanism of young people being deceived in telecommunication fraud. China Youth Social Science, 41(3), 102-112. [3]Alseadoon, I., Othman, M. F. I., & Chan, T. (2015). What Is the Influence of Users' Characteristics on Their Ability to Detect Phishing Emails? In H. A. Sulaiman,

M. A. Othman, M. F. I. Othman, Y. Abd Rahim, & N. C. Pee (Eds.), Advanced Computer and Communication Engineering Technology (pp. 949-962). Springer International Publishing. [4]Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1996). Interpersonal Deception Theory. Communication Theory, 6, 203-242.

Button M., Lewis C., & Tapley J. (2009). Fraud Typolo-gies and the Victims of Fraud: Literature Review. National Fraud Authority.

Langenderfer J., & Shimp T. A. (2001). Consumer Vulnerability to Scams, Swindles, and Fraud: A New Theory of Visceral Influences on Persuasion. Psychology and Mar-keting, 18, 763-783.

Dove M. (2018). Predicting Individual Differences in Vulnerability to Fraud. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Portsmouth.

Norris G., & Brookes A. (2021). Personality, Emotion and Individual Differences in Response to Online Fraud. Personality and Individual Differences, 169, Article 109847. [9]Ferguson, A. J. (2005). Fos-tering Email Security Awareness: The West Point Carronade. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 28, 54-57.

Neupane A., Saxena N., Kuruvilla K., Georgescu M., & Kana R. K. (2014). Neural Signatures of User-Centered Security: An fMRI Study of Phishing, and Malware Warnings. In Proceedings of the Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS) (pp. 1-16). [11]Grazioli, S. (2004). Where Did They Go Wrong? An Analysis of the Failure of Knowledgeable Internet Consumers to Detect Deception over the Internet. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 149-172.

Khalifa H. K. H. (2022). A Conceptual Review on Heu-ristic Systematic Model in Mass Communication Studies. International Journal of Media and Mass Communication, 4, 164- 175.

Modic D., & Lea S. E. (2011). How Neurotic Are Scam Victims, Really? The Big Five and Internet Scams. In 2011 Conference of the International Confederation for the Advancement of Behavioral Economics and Economic Psychology (pp. 1-24).

Loewenstein G. (1996). Out of Control: Visceral Influ-ences on Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 272-292.

Luo X. R., Zhang W., Burd S., & Seazzu A. (2013). Investigating Phishing Victimization with the Heuristic-Systematic Model: A Theoretical Framework and an Exploration. Computers and Security, 38, 28-38.

Alert me when the article has been cited

Submit

No data

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

⁰