In "Experience as a Way of Knowing" (this journal)

the author tries to create some troubles for philosophers who believe in "qualia" or "what it is like". I think the author has underestimated the complexity of the issues

and I will voice my concerns in five sections. Besides presenting my interpretation of the author's position and challenging it

I will (1) challenge the author's treatment of the knowledge argument

especially the author's treatment of "

this

is what it is like to see red"

(2) challenge the author's interpretation of "what-it-is-like" talk and the author's view that phenomenal properties are theoretical postulates

(3) challenge the author's rejection of "apparent properties"

and (4) point out some issues with the author's interpretation of several authors who write about the knowledge argument.