Theoretical Certainty: The Qian-Jia Rationalism1

FENG Shengli

PDF
导出
分享
收藏
专辑

Theoretical Certainty: The Qian-Jia Rationalism1

1卷第1期

浏览量: 0 Downloads: 4

Theoretical Certainty: The Qian-Jia Rationalism1
Theoretical Certainty: The Qian-Jia Rationalism1
The Chinese University of Hong Kong/Beijing Language and Culture University
2017年1卷第1期页码：40-52
纸质出版日期： 2017 ，
DOI：
Accepted：

Scan QR Code

FENG Shengli. (2017). Theoretical Certainty: The Qian-Jia Rationalism1. 认知科学（英文版）, 1(1), 40-52.

FENG SHENGLI. (2017). Theoretical Certainty: The Qian-Jia Rationalism1. Journal of Human Cognition, 1(1), 40-52..
FENG Shengli. (2017). Theoretical Certainty: The Qian-Jia Rationalism1. 认知科学（英文版）, 1(1), 40-52. DOI：

FENG SHENGLI. (2017). Theoretical Certainty: The Qian-Jia Rationalism1. Journal of Human Cognition, 1(1), 40-52.. DOI：

摘要

Abstract

In the 16th century

western science made a great leap. Meanwhile

in China

the development of textual criticism (including scholars Gu Yanwu1613-1682

Dai Zhen 1724-1777

Duan Yucai 1735-1815

Wang Niansun1744-1832)also facilitated the development of scientific factors(Hu Shi 1967)2.This paper argues that Qian-Jia scholars爷work represented a new era of traditional research that the value of scholarships and intellectual work (starting from Gu Yanwu1613-1682

Dai Zhen1724-1777

Duan Yucai 1735-1815

Wang Niansun1744-1832

etc.)is essentially based on what they created and believed

overtly or overtly

the principle of logic certainty——a newly developed indigenous rationalism in the Chinese intellectual history.

关键词

Keywords

Qian-Jia logical certaintyrationalismdeductionaxiomatic thought

references

1. The arguments presented here were partially published in Vol.9,2015. The current research is part of the project on Scientific Research Methods and Concepts in Qian-Jia Scholars Duan Yucai’s and Wang Niansun’s supported by the National Social Science Foundation (Annual ImportantGrant. #15AYY009) and the project on Identification of Chinese as a Foreign Language Style of Register: Identify, Classification and Distribution, supported by Ministry of Education Humanities and Social Science Research Base (MajorProject, #14JJD740003).2. The scientific spirit and method in Chinese philosophy in: Charles Moore (eds.)1967. Honolulu: The University Press of Hawaii.3. 朱晓农（2013）《叫我怎能不想她》商务印书馆。4. I agree with Zhu Xiaonong’s opinions. I also discussed Chinese language’s grammar property whether it is similar to formal logic, or dialectical logic in another paper. Quite a lot of scholars also discussed before, but there is still no scientific analysis of specific factors.5.《从人本到逻辑的学术转型》《中国社会科学论坛》2013 年第一期。6. The prescription here means to discern“independent evidence”from“tautology”. If an“explanation” is just“tautology”not rather than“independent evidence”, it can be regarded as a good explanation of high academic value.7. 参《考工记图后序》之考凫氏之钟。8. 事见（清）江藩《汉学师承记》中华书局1983 版,第85 页。9. The equation can also be: (A=x｜y) ^ (A=x‘) (A=/ y). Zhang Yinsheng’s suggestion is appreciated.10.参冯胜利2003《从人本到逻辑的学术转型》《, 中国社会科学论坛》第 1 期。11.If the categorizing is not based on certain logic, then it will just be tautology.12.Shigeto Kawahara (2012) Acoustic Bases of Sound Symbolism. The State University of New Jersey.13.According to the tradition, scholar Gu Qianli would rather keep the original classic than make any change.14.见《文史知识》2010 年第7 期。15. 刘盼遂《高邮王氏父子年谱》16. The equation can also be: A=B-[(A-x, y, z)-r(B-x, y, z)]. Zhang Shengli’s suggestion is appreciated,and the logic regarding r needs to be further investigated in the future.17. 阮元的《畴人传》18. The monographic research on Qian-Jia Scholar’s scientific thoughts and method in Tianjin University is a primary purpose of its language research center.19. 诸可宝《畴人传三遍·卷三》

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

Submit

No data

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

⁰