Lucian of Samosata's Menippean Satire: Its Place in Bakhtin's Theoretical Frameworks
Lucian of Samosata's Menippean Satire: Its Place in Bakhtin's Theoretical Frameworks
University of Melbourne
2018年2卷第1期 页码:62-88
纸质出版日期:2018,
DOI:
Accepted:
Scan QR Code
John Cook. (2018). Lucian of Samosata's Menippean Satire: Its Place in Bakhtin's Theoretical Frameworks. 批评理论(英文版), 2(1), 62-88.
JOHN COOK. (2018). Lucian of Samosata's Menippean Satire: Its Place in Bakhtin's Theoretical Frameworks. Critical Theory, 2(1), 62-88..
John Cook. (2018). Lucian of Samosata's Menippean Satire: Its Place in Bakhtin's Theoretical Frameworks. 批评理论(英文版), 2(1), 62-88.DOI:
JOHN COOK. (2018). Lucian of Samosata's Menippean Satire: Its Place in Bakhtin's Theoretical Frameworks. Critical Theory, 2(1), 62-88.. DOI:
Lucian of Samosata's Menippean Satire: Its Place in Bakhtin's Theoretical Frameworks
PDF下载
摘要
Abstract
This paper examines a number of aspects of Bakhtin's treatment of Lucian of Samosata (115/125 CE-190 CE)
a Menippean satirist writing during the period of the Second Sophistic. In a similar way to the Roman satirist Varro
Lucian represents an exemplar of the various qualities of menippea
which include a focus on philosophical concerns through a literary lens
the use of literary bricolage
and a multi-planar view of the universe. And like Varro
Lucian provided Bakhtin with the raw material that facilitated a connection between literary theory and an analysis of language. Bakhtin positions Lucian within a long and distinguished Classical tradition of Menippean satire. In addition
the study of Menippean allowed Bakhtin to interweave the traditions of Graeco-Roman
Mediaeval and Renaissance literature with the Russian literary tradition (specifically Dostoevsky) which occurred much closer in time to the ‘zone of contact’ between author and reader. Bakhtin's close focus on the topics of Menippean and Lucian post-date 1929.However
there are indications in Volume 3 of his Collected works that an interest in Lucian is developing. This is confirmed in Volume 5 by ‘Satira’[1940] and in Volume 4-I by ‘Menippova satira ...’[1944]. These texts reference Lucian and the published results of this focus are seen in Bakhtin's works of the 1960s. This focus stresses the serio-comic (spoudogeloion)
juxtaposition or bricolage (syncrisis)
and contestation (anacrisis). There appear to be a number of structural and stylistic connections between Bakhtin's analysis of Lucian's work and Bakhtin's own theory of language. This paper connects Bakhtin's literary theory and his analysis of language: through a review of his theory of heteroglossia and its relationship with parody. Lucian's menippea is characterised by burlesque
an extension of parody and travesty in Bakhtin's literary-theoretical framework. Independently
yet complementary to these two meta-genres
Bakhtin's theory of heteroglossia has clear connections to Lucian's bricolage.
关键词
Keywords
M. M. Bakhtin Lucian of SamosataMenippean Satire MenippeaParodySerio-comic SpoudogeloionJuxtaposition Bricolage SyncrisisContestation Anacrisis