Research on the Application of Moral Judgment in the Field of autonomous vehicle

Yuzheng Li

doi:10.47297/taposatWSP2633-456907.20250605

PDF
导出
分享
收藏
专辑

Research on the Application of Moral Judgment in the Field of autonomous vehicle

6卷第5期

浏览量: 0 Downloads: 0

Research on the Application of Moral Judgment in the Field of autonomous vehicle
Research on the Application of Moral Judgment in the Field of autonomous vehicle
Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, Shandong, 252059, China
2025年6卷第5期页码：33-35
纸质出版日期：2025-05-19
DOI：10.47297/taposatWSP2633-456907.20250605
Accepted：

Scan QR Code

(2025). Research on the Application of Moral Judgment in the Field of autonomous vehicle. 科技理论与实践（英文版）, 6(5), 33-35.

Li Yuzheng.Research on the Application of Moral Judgment in the Field of autonomous vehicle[J].Theory and Practice of Science and Technology,2025,06(05):33-35.
(2025). Research on the Application of Moral Judgment in the Field of autonomous vehicle. 科技理论与实践（英文版）, 6(5), 33-35. DOI： 10.47297/taposatWSP2633-456907.20250605.

Li Yuzheng.Research on the Application of Moral Judgment in the Field of autonomous vehicle[J].Theory and Practice of Science and Technology,2025,06(05):33-35. DOI： 10.47297/taposatWSP2633-456907.20250605.

摘要

Abstract

This paper comprehensively discusses the decision-making problems of autonomous vehicle when facing moral dilemmas

and analyzes how individuals make moral judgments according to different moral behavior tendencies. This article also explains that in the inevitable accidents of autonomous vehicle

the moral choices people need to make are not only related to the technical level

but also touch on the deep moral concepts and values. The article not only discusses the public's preference for moral algorithms of autonomous vehicle

but also finds that people's moral judgments of human drivers and autonomous vehicle are different in different situations

and their decisions in moral dilemmas are affected by many factors

including decision-making modes

personal perspectives and situational factors. Finally

this paper emphasizes the importance of the humanized development of autonomous vehicle technology

and how to improve the public's understanding and acceptance of ethical decisions on autonomous vehicle through education and training.

关键词

Keywords

references

Gawronski B, Brannon S M. Power and moral dilemma judgments: Distinct effects of memory recall versus social roles[J]. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2020, 86:103908.

Kallioinen N, Pershina M, Zeiser J, Nezami F N, Pipa G, Stephan A, König P. Moral judgements on the actions of self-driving cars and human drivers in dilemma situations from different perspectives[J ] . Frontiers in Psychology, 2019, 10 .

Frank D, Chrysochou P, Mitkidis P, Ariely D. Human decision-making biases in the moral dilemmas of autonomous vehicles[J]. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1).

Cushman F, Young L, Greene I D. Our multi-system moral psychology: Towards a consensus view[C]. In: Doris J M, ed. Oxford Handbook of Moral Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

de Melo C M, Marsella S, Gratch J. Risk of injury in moral dilemmas with autonomous vehicles[J]. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 2021, 7:572529.

Cohen D J, Ahn M. A subjective utilitarian theory of moral judgment[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2016, 145(10):1359–1381.

Bruno G, Spoto A, Lotto L, Cellini N, Cutini S, Sarlo M. Framing self-sacrifice in the investigation of moral judgment and moral emotions in human and autonomous driving dilemmas[J]. Motivation and Emotion, 2023, 47(5):781–794.

Himmelreich J. No wheel but a dial: Why and how passengers in self-driving cars should decide how their car drives[J]. Ethics and Information Technology, 2022, 24(4).

Bergmann L T, Schlicht L, Meixner C, König P, Pipa G, Boshammer S, Stephan A. Autonomous vehicles require socio-political acceptance—An empirical and philosophical perspective on the problem of moral decision making[J ] . Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 2018, 12 .

Lotto L, Sarlo M, Manfrinati A. A new set of moral dilemmas: Norms for moral acceptability, decision times, and emotional salience[J]. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2014, 16(20):6513–6525.

Sui T. Exploring moral algorithm preferences in autonomous vehicle dilemmas: An empirical study[J ] . Frontiers in Psychology, 2023, 14 .

Hong J W, Wang Y, Lanz P. Why is artificial intelligence blamed more? Analysis of faulting artificial intelligence for self-driving car accidents in experimental settings[J]. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 2020, 36(18):1768–1774.

Li S, Zhang J, Li P, Wang Y, Wang Q. Influencing factors of driving decision-making under the moral dilemma[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7:104132–104142.

Chen N, Zu Y, Song J. Research on the influence and mechanism of human–vehicle moral matching on trust in autonomous vehicles[J ] . Frontiers in Psychology, 2023, 14 .

Ju U, Kang J, Wallraven C. To brake or not to brake? Personality traits predict decision-making in an accident situation[J ] . Frontiers in Psychology, 2019, 10 .

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

Submit

No data

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

⁰