6卷 第5期
School of Law, Gansu University of Political Science and Law, Lanzhou, Gansu,730000
纸质出版日期：2025-05-19
Scan QR Code
(2025). Paradigm Reconfiguration of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) Copyright Protection. 科技理论与实践（英文版）, 6(5), 100-106.
Pang Tianyu.Paradigm Reconfiguration of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) Copyright Protection[J].Theory and Practice of Science and Technology,2025,06(05):100-106.
(2025). Paradigm Reconfiguration of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) Copyright Protection. 科技理论与实践（英文版）, 6(5), 100-106. DOI： 10.47297/taposatWSP2633-456920.20250605.
Pang Tianyu.Paradigm Reconfiguration of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) Copyright Protection[J].Theory and Practice of Science and Technology,2025,06(05):100-106. DOI： 10.47297/taposatWSP2633-456920.20250605.
With the breakthrough development of generative AI technology
the traditional legal framework is facing serious challenges in the protection of AI-generated content copyright. China's current Copyright Law is difficult to adapt to the technological reality due to the conflict between the logic of "anthropocentrism" and the "non-human origin" of AIGC
the ambiguity of the originality determination standard
and the lack of rules on the attribution of rights
etc. This paper analyzes the differences in judicial practice and the disputes in the academic field on the relevant issues. This paper reveals the theoretical dilemmas and practical contradictions of the current system by analyzing the differences in judicial practice and the disputes in the academic field. On this basis
it puts forward the paradigm reconstruction path for the copyright protection of AI-generated content: firstly
to break through the element of "human intellectual achievements"
and add the category of "technologically generated works"; secondly
to improve the defects in the identification of the main body
and to emphasize the user as the leading creator
and the limited rights of the developers and platforms. The second is to improve the defects in the identification of the subject
emphasize the limited rights of developers and platforms
and construct a "layered protection + contribution quantification" rights attribution mechanism
distinguishing between the complete protection of strongly original content and the limited exclusivity rights of weakly original content. Through comparative law and localized system design
this paper aims to provide a theoretical framework for AIGC copyright protection that balances technological innovation and legal fairness.
Fang Zhi Ge, "The Construction of Subjective Criteria for the Originality of Content Generated by Artificial Intelligence: Centering on the "Creation Tool Said"", Oriental Jurisprudence, 2024.
Deng Aisi. On the Copyright Protection of Content Generated by Artificial Intelligence[J]. Dispute Resolution, 2025, 11(1): 125-132.
Xiao Hai and Zhang Kunsheng, "Reflection and Reconstruction of Copyright Law under the Threshold of Artificial Intelligence Creative Objects", Journal of Chongqing University of Technology 2021, No. 9.
Yi Ling and Wang Jing, "On the Protection of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content Copyright Law," Journal of Xiangtan University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), No. 6 , 2019.
Liao Si, "On the Composition of Originality and Attribution of Rights of Artificial Intelligence Creations", Journal of Northwest University for Nationalities, No. 2 , 2020.
Xiong Qi, "Copyright Recognition of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content," Intellectual Property, No. 3 , 2017
Cong Lixian,Li Yonglin. Identification of Works and Copyright Attribution of Generative AI--Taking ChatGPT's Work Application Scenario as an Example[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition),2023,(04):171-181.
ZHANG Ping. The Institutional Difficulties of Copyright Legitimacy of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content and Its Solution Path[J]. Legal Science (Journal of Northwestern University of Politics and Law),2024,42(03):18-31.
Chen Hu, "On the Copyrightability of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content - An Examination Centered on Originality in the Context of China's Copyright Law", Intelligence Magazine, No. 5 , 20 20.
Wang Qian, ""On the Characterization of Content Generated by Artificial Intelligence in Copyright Law,"" Legal Science, No. 5 , 2017.
Liu Ying, "Initial Exploration of the Copyright Law Protection of Artificial Intelligence Generated Objects," Intellectual Property, No. 9 , 2017.
Chen Jianqiang. Characterization of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content and Attribution of Rights in Copyright Law[J]. Law, 2024, 12(7): 4543-4548.
Xu Xiaoben, "On the Equal Protection of Artificial Intelligence-Generated Content under Copyright Law," in China Law Journal, Vol. 1 , No. 1 , 2024, pp. 166 - 185 .
Yang Yaxin. Analyzing the Copyright Attribution of Artificial Intelligence Generated Works[J]. Law, 2024, 12(1): 286-290.
Cong Lixian,Li Yonglin. Identification of Works and Copyright Attribution of Generative AI--Taking ChatGPT's Work Application Scenario as an Example[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition),2023,(04):171-181.
Wu Handong. Research on Copyright Issues of Artificial Intelligence Generated Objects[J]. Legal Research,2020,42(04):78-90.
Cong Lixian,Li Yonglin. Identification of Works and Copyright Attribution of Generative AI--Taking ChatGPT's Work Application Scenario as an Example[J]. Journal of Shandong University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition),2023,(04):171-181.
Sui Mingzhi. On the Copyright Protection Mode of Content Generated by Artificial Intelligence-Taking China's First Case of "AI Wensheng Pattern" as an Example[J]. Publishing and Printing, 2024,(04):11-19.
Xu Xiaoben. On the Equal Protection of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content under Copyright Law[J]. China Law Journal, 2024,(01):166-185.
Xiong Qi,Zhang Wenmei. Global Trend and Local Path of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content Copyright Regulation[J]. Intellectual Property Rights,2024,(11):59-76.
Cao Bo. Copyright regulation of artificial intelligence-assisted content generation[J]. Comparative Law Research, 2024,(01):76-90.
EU Parliament. Artificial Intelligence Act. 2021/0106(COD), Art.52(2).
Liang Zhiwen. On the Legal Protection of Artificial Intelligence Creations[J]. Legal Science(Journal of Northwest University of Politics and Law),2017,35(05):156-165.
Directive 96/9/EC of the European Parliament on the legal protection of databases, Art. 7 (1996).
Cui, Guobin. The underlying theory of limited exclusivity in big data[J]. Legal Research, 2023(4): 78-92.
European Parliament. Directive 96/9/EC on the legal protection of databases[J]. Official Journal of the European Communities, 1996, L77: 20-28.
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
京公网安备11010802024621