Analysis of the Judicial Dilemmas in Punitive Damages for Intellectual Property Infringement

Mimi Zhang

doi:10.47297/wspelWSP2515-824406.20240802

PDF
导出
分享
收藏
专辑

Analysis of the Judicial Dilemmas in Punitive Damages for Intellectual Property Infringement

8卷第2期

浏览量: 0 Downloads: 0

Analysis of the Judicial Dilemmas in Punitive Damages for Intellectual Property Infringement
Analysis of the Judicial Dilemmas in Punitive Damages for Intellectual Property Infringement
School of Law, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou, Hunan, 412000
2024年8卷第2期页码：32-37
纸质出版日期： 2024-12-26 ，
DOI：10.47297/wspelWSP2515-824406.20240802
Accepted：

Scan QR Code

(2024). Analysis of the Judicial Dilemmas in Punitive Damages for Intellectual Property Infringement. 老年法学（英文版）, 8(2), 32-37.

MIMI ZHANG. (2024). Analysis of the Judicial Dilemmas in Punitive Damages for Intellectual Property Infringement. Elder Law, 8(2), 32-37..
(2024). Analysis of the Judicial Dilemmas in Punitive Damages for Intellectual Property Infringement. 老年法学（英文版）, 8(2), 32-37. DOI： 10.47297/wspelWSP2515-824406.20240802.

MIMI ZHANG. (2024). Analysis of the Judicial Dilemmas in Punitive Damages for Intellectual Property Infringement. Elder Law, 8(2), 32-37.. DOI： 10.47297/wspelWSP2515-824406.20240802.

摘要

Abstract

This study explores the judicial dilemmas surrounding punitive damages in intellectual property infringement cases

including uncertainty in legal standards

challenges in cross-border enforcement

and varying legislative and judicial practices across jurisdictions. Although punitive damages aim to punish and deter willful infringement

their applicability and enforcement face significant hurdles in a globalized context. Conflicts of law

inconsistencies in awards

and the complexities of international enforcement increase the difficulties of protecting IP rights. The paper also calls for the harmonization of punitive damages standards at the international level to enhance legal predictability and fairness. Additionally

it proposes legislative reforms and emphasizes the importance of judicial guidelines in balancing fairness and deterrence. Ultimately

the paper envisions the evolving role of punitive damages in IP protection

highlighting the need for a framework that effectively promotes innovation while holding infringers accountable.

关键词

Keywords

punitive damagesintellectual propertylegal standardsenforcement challengesinternational harmonization

references

Wan V., & Jiming Y. (2021). Torts and intellectual property in Industry 4.0: a comparative study of Chinese and American jurisprudence. Peking University Law Journal, 9(1), 111-142.

Eviani N. Y., Maskun M., & Faqi A. F. (2024). Legal Challenges of AI-Induced Copyright Infringement: Evaluating Liability and Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in Digital Era. Jambura Law Review, 6(2), 403-428.

Dong S. (2023). Study on the Application of Punitive Damages for Copyright Infringement. Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 3(2), 127-131.

Hu H. (2023). Study on the Dilemma and Improvement of the Punitive Damages System for Intellectual Property Rights. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 9, 795-801.

Tang Y. (2022). Extraterritorial experience with intellectual property punitive damages. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 10(12), 360-375.

Wang W. (2024). Deterring Erroneous Notices Concerning Intellectual Property Infringement on China's Internet Platforms. IIC-International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 1-24.

Chen Y. (2022). [Retracted] Judicial Application of Punitive Damages for Ecological Environment Infringement in Civil Public Interest Litigation. Journal of Environmental and Public Health, 2022(1), 6127388.

Hao L. (2024). Court Discretion in Property Damage Compensation for Personality Rights Infringement. Science of Law Journal, 3(3), 35-44.

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

Submit

No data

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

⁰