Discursive Construction of China's "Double First-Class" Policy: A Five-Dimensional Analysis Based on the Wahlström &amp; Sundberg Framework

Chaobin Zou; Xue Li; Feng Li

doi:10.47297/wspiedWSP2516-250016.20261002

PDF
导出
分享
收藏
专辑

Discursive Construction of China's "Double First-Class" Policy: A Five-Dimensional Analysis Based on the Wahlström & Sundberg Framework

10卷第2期

浏览量: 0 Downloads: 0

Discursive Construction of China's "Double First-Class" Policy: A Five-Dimensional Analysis Based on the Wahlström & Sundberg Framework
Discursive Construction of China's "Double First-Class" Policy: A Five-Dimensional Analysis Based on the Wahlström & Sundberg Framework
1.Gachon University, Seongnam, Gyeonggi, 13120, Republic of Korea
2.Neijiang Normal University, Neijiang, Sichuan, 641100, China
3.No.6 Middle School of Neijiang City, Neijiang, Sichuan, 641100, China
2026年10卷第2期页码：81-86
纸质出版：2026-02-28
DOI：10.47297/wspiedWSP2516-250016.20261002
Accepted：

Scan QR Code

Chaobin Zou, Xue Li & Feng Li. (2026). Discursive Construction of China's "Double First-Class" Policy: A Five-Dimensional Analysis Based on the Wahlström & Sundberg Framework. 国际教育与发展（英文版）, 10(2), 81-86.

Zou Chaobin,Li Xue,Li Feng.Discursive Construction of China's "Double First-Class" Policy: A Five-Dimensional Analysis Based on the Wahlström & Sundberg Framework[J].Journal of International Education and Development,2026,10(02):81-86.
Chaobin Zou, Xue Li & Feng Li. (2026). Discursive Construction of China's "Double First-Class" Policy: A Five-Dimensional Analysis Based on the Wahlström & Sundberg Framework. 国际教育与发展（英文版）, 10(2), 81-86. DOI： 10.47297/wspiedWSP2516-250016.20261002.

Zou Chaobin,Li Xue,Li Feng.Discursive Construction of China's "Double First-Class" Policy: A Five-Dimensional Analysis Based on the Wahlström & Sundberg Framework[J].Journal of International Education and Development,2026,10(02):81-86. DOI： 10.47297/wspiedWSP2516-250016.20261002.

摘要

Abstract

This study examines the discursive construction of China's "Double First-Class" (DFC) higher education policy. While existing research has predominantly focused on implementation outcomes

scant attention has been paid to how the policy itself is discursively shaped and rendered legitimate. Drawing on discursive institutionalism as a theoretical lens

this study employs Wahlström and Sundberg's five-dimensional analytical framework—encompassing the epistemological

political

ethical

aesthetic

and instrumental/utilitarian dimensions—to conduct a qualitative content analysis of core DFC policy texts. The findings reveal that DFC policy discourse constitutes a multi-layered structure anchored by two overarching logics: state volition and performativity. The political dimension (national strategic imperatives) and the instrumental dimension (performance-driven logic) jointly shape a utilitarian conception of knowledge (epistemology)

a narrative of service to the nation as the supreme good (ethics)

and a heroic mobilizational rhetoric (aesthetics). These five dimensions operate synergistically to construct a self-reinforcing legitimacy narrative chain from "why build" to "how to build." However

deep-seated internal tensions persist

principally between rigid state discipline and university autonomy

between universalistic world-class standards and particularistic Chinese characteristics

and between the long-term mission of moral cultivation and the short-term pressures of performativity. This study demonstrates that these discursive tensions constitute root causes of practical dilemmas

offering a novel diagnostic perspective for understanding the internal dynamics of Chinese higher education reform.

关键词

Keywords

references

Bie D. , & Wu P . ( 2019 ). Ten key relationships facing universities in "Double First-Class" construction . China Higher Education Research , ( 2 ): 1 – 8 .

Blyth M. ( 2002 ). Great transformations: Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century . Cambridge University Press .

Campbell J . L . ( 2002 ). Ideas, politics, and public policy. Annual Review of Sociology , 28 , 21 – 38 .

Carstensen M. B. , & Schmidt V . A . ( 2016 ). Power through, over and in ideas: Conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy , 23 ( 3 ): 318 – 337 .

Chen H . ( 2016 ). From "211" and "985" to "Double First-Class": The logical evolution of national construction plans . Peking University Education Review , 14 ( 2 ): 2 – 11 .

Fischer F. ( 2003 ). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices . Oxford University Press .

Hsieh H. F. , & Shannon S . E . ( 2005 ). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research , 15 ( 9 ): 1277 – 1288 .

Kehm B . M . ( 2014 ). The German "Excellence Initiative" and its impact on the German higher education system. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences , 141 , 168 – 172 .

Liu N . ( 2017 ). World-class university and first-class discipline construction with Chinese characteristics: Challenges and pathways . Tsinghua Journal of Education , 38 ( 1 ): 1 – 11 .

Marginson S . ( 2016 ). The worldwide trend to high participation university systems . Higher Education , 72 ( 4 ): 423 – 439 .

Meng Q. , & Li M . ( 2021 ). The discursive construction of healthcare reform in China . Health Policy , 125 ( 2 ): 211 – 219 .

Salmi J. ( 2009 ). The challenge of establishing world-class universities . The World Bank.

Schmidt V . A . ( 2008 ). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science , 11 , 303 – 326 .

Schmidt V . A . ( 2011 ). Speaking of change: Why discourse is key to the dynamics of policy transformation. Critical Policy Studies , 5 ( 2 ): 106 – 126 .

Shan Z . ( 2010 ). A genealogical investigation of the "quality education" discourse . Educational Research , 8 ,: 3 – 12 .

Shi W . ( 2021 ). Value reflection and practical direction of university evaluation under "Double First-Class" construction . Fudan Education Forum , 19 ( 3 ): 21 – 27 .

Wahlström N. , & Sundberg D . ( 2018 ). Transnational curriculum inquiry: Politics, culture, and knowledge . Routledge .

Xiong Q . ( 2017 ). Strategies, models and experiences of world-class university construction: A comparative analysis based on eleven countries . Comparative Education Review , 39 ( 1 ): 65 – 72 .

Yan F . ( 2017 ). From "Project 985" to "Double First-Class" construction: Stratification and classification of universities . China Higher Education Research , ( 1 ): 7 – 13 .

Zhou G. , & Wu J . ( 2020 ). Policy effects of "Double First-Class" construction: A PSM-DID analysis . Higher Education Research , 41 ( 7 ): 11 – 23 .

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

Submit

Thematic Analysis of the Speeches by Emma Watson at the United Nations and Adlai Stevenson's Presidential Campaign Speech

Related Author

Yuanyuan Zhang University of Hong Kong, Hongkong

Related Institution

University of Hong Kong, Hongkong

⁰

Discursive Construction of China's "Double First-Class" Policy: A Five-Dimensional Analysis Based on the Wahlström & Sundberg Framework

Discursive Construction of China's "Double First-Class" Policy: A Five-Dimensional Analysis Based on the Wahlström & Sundberg Framework

DOI：10.47297/wspiedWSP2516-250016.20261002

摘要

Abstract

关键词

Keywords

references