Has English Property Law gone too far in Equitable Protection

Jingchi Wen

doi:10.47297/wspjclrWSP2516-249707.20250903

PDF
导出
分享
收藏
专辑

Has English Property Law gone too far in Equitable Protection

9卷第3期

浏览量: 0 Downloads: 0

Has English Property Law gone too far in Equitable Protection
Has English Property Law gone too far in Equitable Protection
Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Law, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO171BJ, United Kingdom
2025年9卷第3期页码：36-38
纸质出版：2025-09-30
DOI：10.47297/wspjclrWSP2516-249707.20250903
Accepted：

Scan QR Code

(2025). Has English Property Law gone too far in Equitable Protection. 商事法律评论（英文版）, 9(3), 36-38.

Wen Jingchi.Has English Property Law gone too far in Equitable Protection[J].Journal of Commercial Law Review,2025,09(03):36-38.
(2025). Has English Property Law gone too far in Equitable Protection. 商事法律评论（英文版）, 9(3), 36-38. DOI： 10.47297/wspjclrWSP2516-249707.20250903.

Wen Jingchi.Has English Property Law gone too far in Equitable Protection[J].Journal of Commercial Law Review,2025,09(03):36-38. DOI： 10.47297/wspjclrWSP2516-249707.20250903.

摘要

Abstract

In recent decades

whether English property law has gone too far in equitable protection has raised constant debate

which has been characterised by a gulf between the argument that the equitable doctrine has gone too far in allowing remedies to parties and that the protection provided by it is generally reasonable. In this article

I will first demonstrate the process of creating and transferring legal property rights which has so far been set down in English property law and the main equitable doctrines: the doctrine of anticipation

proprietary estoppel

and constructive trust. On the basis of deeply analysing some criticism surrounding these three doctrines respectively

I will draw a conclusion that the equitable doctrines of protection have so far been circumscribed to a reasonable extent and thus not to be too excessive.

关键词

Keywords

references

Lawson F H , Rudden B . The Law of Property [M ] . 3rd ed n. Oxford : Oxford University Press , 2012 .

Birks . Five Keys to Land Law [C ] //Bright, Dewar (eds). Land Law: Themes and Perspectives . 1998 : 472 - 473 .

[1965 ] AC 1175 [EB/OL ] .

Hackney J . Understanding Equity and Trusts [M ] . 1st ed n . London : Fontana , 1987 :ch 1.

Edelman . Two Fundamental Questions for the Law of Trusts [J ] . Law Quarterly Review , 2013 , 129 : 66 .

Heydon , Leeming , Turner . Equity: Doctrine and Remedies [M ] . 5th ed n . London : Butterworths , 2015 :ch 2.

Hackney J . Understanding Equity and Trusts [M ] . 1st ed n . London : Fontana , 1987 : 20 - 22 .

Law of Property Act 1925 , s 1 [EB/OL ] .

Law of Property Act 1925 , s 53 [EB/OL ] .

Land Registration Act 2002 , s 27 [EB/OL ] .

Walsh v Lonsdale (1882 ) LR 21 Ch D 9 [EB/OL ] .

Hopkins . The Informal Acquisition of Rights in Land [M ] . 2000 : 63 .

Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 , s 6 [EB/OL ] .

Hackney J . Understanding Equity and Trusts [M ] . 1st ed n . London : Fontana , 1987 : 20 - 22 .

Land Registration Act 2002 , Sch 3 [EB/OL ] .

Law Commission . Sharing Homes: A Discussion Paper [R ] . Report No 278 , 2002 :[1. 11 ] .

Mee . Proprietary Estoppel, Promises and Mistaken Belief [C ] //Bright (ed). Modern Studies in Property Law Vol 6 . 2011 : 182 .

[2009 ] UKHL 18 [EB/OL ] . Lord Hoffmann .

Swadling . The Law of Property [C ] //Burrows (ed). English Private Law . 3rd ed n . 2013 :[4.23 ] .

Burrows . We Do This at Common Law But That in Equity [J ] . Oxford Journal of Legal Studies , 2002 , 22 : 1 .

Worthington . Equity [M ] . 2nd ed n . 2006 : 73 - 77 .

[2007 ] 2 AC 432 [EB/OL ] :[40 ] - [48 ] .

[2012 ] AC 776[ EB/OL ] :[35 ] .

Dewar . Land, Law and the Family Home [C ] //Bright, Dewar (eds). Land Law: Themes and Perspectives . Oxford : Oxford University Press , 1998 .

Hopkins . The Relevance of Context in Property Law: A Case for Judicial Restraint? [J ] . Legal Studies , 2011 , 31 : 175 - 196 .

Dixon . Editor's Notebook: The Still Not Ended, Never-Ending Story [J ] . Conveyancer and Property Lawyer , 2012 : 83 - 86 .

Sloan . Keeping Up with the Jones Case: Establishing Constructive Trusts in "Sole Legal Owner" Scenarios [J ] . Legal Studies , 2014 , DOI: 10.1111/lest.12052 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lest.12052 .

Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 , s 14 [EB/OL ] .

Bright , McFarlane . Proprietary Estoppel and Property Rights [J ] . Cambridge Law Journal , 2005 : 449 - 454 .

Hopkins . Proprietary Estoppel: A Functional Analysis [J ] . Journal of Equity , 2010 , 4 : 201 .

Land Registration Act 2002 , s 116 [EB/OL ] .

Law Commission . Land Registration for the Twenty-First Century: A Conveyancing Revolution [R ] . Report No 271 , 2001 :[5. 30 ] .

Jennings v Rice [2003 ] 1 P & CR 8 ; Parker v Parker [2003 ] EWHC 1846[EB/OL ] .

Smith H . Property, Equity, and the Rule of Law [C ] // Private Law and the Rule of Law . Oxford : Oxford University Press , 2014 .

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

Submit

No data

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

⁰