The Judicial Dilemmas and Rule Reconstruction of Network Platform Liability in Personal Information Leakage Infringement

Haoyue Zhang

doi:10.47297/wspjclrWSP2516-249707.20261002

PDF
导出
分享
收藏
专辑

The Judicial Dilemmas and Rule Reconstruction of Network Platform Liability in Personal Information Leakage Infringement

10卷第2期

浏览量: 0 Downloads: 0

The Judicial Dilemmas and Rule Reconstruction of Network Platform Liability in Personal Information Leakage Infringement
The Judicial Dilemmas and Rule Reconstruction of Network Platform Liability in Personal Information Leakage Infringement
East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, 200237, China
2026年10卷第2期页码：39-44
网络首发：2026-07-24，

纸质出版：2026-06-30
DOI：10.47297/wspjclrWSP2516-249707.20261002
Accepted：

Scan QR Code

Haoyue Zhang. (2026). The Judicial Dilemmas and Rule Reconstruction of Network Platform Liability in Personal Information Leakage Infringement. 商事法律评论（英文版）, 10(2), 39-44.

Zhang Haoyue.The Judicial Dilemmas and Rule Reconstruction of Network Platform Liability in Personal Information Leakage Infringement[J].Journal of Commercial Law Review,2026,10(02):39-44.
Haoyue Zhang. (2026). The Judicial Dilemmas and Rule Reconstruction of Network Platform Liability in Personal Information Leakage Infringement. 商事法律评论（英文版）, 10(2), 39-44. DOI： 10.47297/wspjclrWSP2516-249707.20261002.

Zhang Haoyue.The Judicial Dilemmas and Rule Reconstruction of Network Platform Liability in Personal Information Leakage Infringement[J].Journal of Commercial Law Review,2026,10(02):39-44. DOI： 10.47297/wspjclrWSP2516-249707.20261002.

摘要

Abstract

The dominant position of network platforms in personal information processing makes the determination of their fault a core challenge in establishing tort liability. Although Article 69 of the <Personal Information Protection Law> (PIPL) establishes the principle of presumed fault

judicial practice still faces a trilemma: vague and formalized fault determination standards

an imbalanced allocation of the burden of proof

and ineffective damage relief. These dilemmas stem from ambiguous legislative norms

the absence of substantive judicial review standards

the technological cognition gap

and the misalignment of interests. To this end

an objective and differentiated fault determination rule centered on the "breach of security safeguarding obligations" should be reconstructed. It is necessary to optimize the dynamic allocation of the burden of proof by clarifying the standards for the victim's preliminary proof and the platform's rebuttal. Furthermore

the scope of damage recognition should be expanded by introducing punitive damages and diversified relief mechanisms. Through a systemic reshaping of judicial rules

it is possible to strengthen the protection of personal information rights and interests while accommodating the healthy development of the digital industry

thereby providing clear guidance for judicial practice.

关键词

Keywords

references

Ding X . D . ( 2022 ). From individual remedy to public gove rnance: Judicial response to personal information infringement. Legal Research , 3 , 145 - 162 .

Ding X . D . ( 2021 ). From network and personal information to artificial intelligence: Tort law transformation in the digital era. China Legal Science , 4 , 123 - 142 .

Mo Y . S . ( 2022 ). Tort liability construction of e-commerce platform operators violating security obligations. Law Science Forum , 2 , 89 - 100 .

Jin Y . ( 2023 ). Judicial dilemma and rule response of personal information protection—An empirical study based on 331 personal information cases . Business and Law Review , 1 , 102 - 115 .

Wang D . F . ( 2022 ). Research on the presumption of fault liability of personal information processors. Law Review , 5 , 98 - 115 .

Yang L . X . ( 2021 ). Civil liability of personal information processors for infringing personal information rights and interests. Renmin University of China Law Journal , 6 , 105 - 116 .

Chen Z . J . ( 2022 ). Research on the imputation principle of personal information processor infringement—Also on the adjudication rules of personal information infringement disputes. Political Science and Law Forum , 4 , 78 - 92 .

Mo Y . S . ( 2023 ). Presumption of fault liability in personal information infringement: Question, response, system coordination and rule application. Law Science , 2 , 134 - 148 .

Lv Y . ( 2022 ). Analysis on the rule of damage determination in personal information infringement . People's Judiciary , 15 , 76 - 82 .

Mo Y . S . ( 2023 ). The dynamic system theory of tort law protection for personal information rights and interests. Chinese and Foreign Law , 3 , 678 - 698 .

Wang X . ( 2022 ). Reconstruction of the judgment and compensation framework of dual risk damage of personal information . Law Science Magazine , 7 , 56 - 68 .

Yao J . ( 2021 ). On the civil liability of personal information processors . Legal Research , 5 , 156 - 172 .

Chen Y. , & Zeng R . Y . ( 2025 ). On the imputation principle and application of personal information infringement—Based on paragraph 1 of Article 69 of the Personal Information Protection Law. Digital Economy and Rule of Law , 1 , 205-225+279 - 280 .

Cheng X . ( 2023 ). On the illegality and fault in the tort liability of personal information infringement . China Legal Science , 2 , 178 - 196 .

Gong W . B . ( 2022 ). Compliance obligations of network platforms in processing personal information and their path of exemption from criminal liability. Political Science and Law Review , 6 , 109 - 120 .

Ding X . D . ( 2021 ). Reconstructing "notice": Reflection on platform indirect tort liability. Law Science , 8 , 102 - 115 .