A New Kind of Action Explanation and The Life of Complex Action

Xingfei Zheng

doi:10.47297/wspjhcWSP2515-469904.20210501

PDF
导出
分享
收藏
专辑

A New Kind of Action Explanation and The Life of Complex Action

null卷第1期

浏览量: 0 Downloads: 5

A New Kind of Action Explanation and The Life of Complex Action
A New Kind of Action Explanation and The Life of Complex Action
Peking University Beijing 100091
2021年第1期页码：58-74
纸质出版日期： 2021-06-30 ，
DOI：10.47297/wspjhcWSP2515-469904.20210501
Accepted：

Scan QR Code

(2021). A New Kind of Action Explanation and The Life of Complex Action. 认知科学（英文版）, (1), 58-74.

XINGFEI ZHENG. (2021). A New Kind of Action Explanation and The Life of Complex Action. Critical Theory, (1), 58-74..
(2021). A New Kind of Action Explanation and The Life of Complex Action. 认知科学（英文版）, (1), 58-74. DOI： 10.47297/wspjhcWSP2515-469904.20210501.

XINGFEI ZHENG. (2021). A New Kind of Action Explanation and The Life of Complex Action. Critical Theory, (1), 58-74.. DOI： 10.47297/wspjhcWSP2515-469904.20210501.

摘要

Abstract

Ordinary action explanation formulated as "I am doing A because I am doing B" is explanation of an action in terms of another action-in-progress. According to Michael Thompson

the explained action is a teleological part of the explaining complex action

which is composed of different parts. Thompson's analysis focuses on the part-whole relation between the explained action and the explaining action

thus ignores a possibility: these two actions can be two different parts of a complex action. I shall argue that the interrelation between different parts of a complex action corresponds to a new kind of action explanation of the formulas: "I am doing A because I am doing B" and "I am doing B because I have done A"

where A and B are two different parts of a complex action. This kind of action explanation is associated with the temporal schema of an action-type

for example

X: First

do A; second

do B; then

C; finally

D. This is an attempt to probe into the inner structure of complex action.

关键词

Keywords

Complex actionAction explanationPart-part relationTemporal schema

references

Anscombe G E M. Intention[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000.

Austin J L. A Plea for Excuses[M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961.

Boyle L. Goodness and Desire[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Davidson D. Action, Reasons and Causes[J]. Essays on Actions and Events, 2001, 3-20.

Davidson D. Agency[J]. Essays on Actions and Events, 2001, 43-62.

Falvey. Knowledge in Intention[J]. Philosophical Studies, 2000, 99(1): 21-44.

Frey J. Anscombe on Practical Knowledge and the Good[J]. Ergo, 2019, 39: 1121-1151.

Frey J. Happiness as the Constitutive Principle of Action in Thomas Aquinas[J]. Philosophical Explorations, 2019, 22(2): 208-221.

Ford A. Action and Generality[J]. Pittsburgh PhD Dissertation, 2008.

Ford A. Essays on Anscombe’s Intention[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2011.

Lavin D. Must There Be Basic Actions[J]. Noûs, 2013, 47(2): 273-301.

Müller A. Backward-looking Rationality and the Unity of Practical Reason[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2011.

Rödl S. Self-Consciousness[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2007.

Rödl S. The Form of the Will[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Setiya K. Reasons without Rationalism[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.

Smith M. The Structure of Orthonomy[J]. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 2004, 55: 165-193.

Stout R. Ballistic Action[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.

Tenenbaum S. Desire, Practical Reason, and the Good[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Thompson M. Life and Action[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2008.

Wilson G. The Intentionality of Human Action[M].Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989.

Valaris M. The Instrumental Structure of Actions[J]. Philosophical Quarterly, 2015, 65: 64-83.

文章被引用时，请邮件提醒。

Submit

No data

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

⁰